Lindsay's Third Reader Response (Page 85-120)
After I finished Night and set it down once more, I reflected upon the contents of this most heartwrenching story. The insufferable horrors seem so unreal, and I still cannot seem to fathom how any of it could have ever actually happened. It seems as if the story was simply a truly riveting fictional piece, though I know this is certainly not the case, no matter how much I wish it could be. As the story progressed, I had hoped Elie's situation had finally improved. However, it only seemed to be getting worse, and my heart raced and ached along with his. I became very angry when, at the beginning of this third section of the text, the SS officers were treating the Jews so inhumanely. Their march, or run, seems so unreal to me. Elie recalls, "From time to time, a shot exploded in the darkness. They had orders to shoot anyone who could not sustain the pace. Their fingers on the triggers, they did not deprive themselves of the pleasure. If one of us stopped for a second, a quick shot eliminated the filthy dog" (85). The simple comparison to a dog really struck me. It illustrates how the officers viewed the prisoners as no more than animals, helpless creatures who could easily be disposed of and replaced at the drop of a hat. I was also appalled at the mention of the pleasure felt by the officers upon killing an Jew. How could one feel joy at another's expense? How could one feel happy about killing another human being? The idea simply baffles me, and this is why I was so surprised as well as angry whilst reading this portion of the text.
Another part of the text that really bothered me was the whole issue of the father and son relationships. It seems that this was mentioned over and over again during the later part of the story, and each time it seems that a son gave up on a father. For example, when the deceased lay upon the snow, Elie says, "Sons abonded the remains of their fathers without a tear" (92). Another example of this heartbreaking scenario arose when bread was thrown into one of the cars holding the Jews. An old man tried to eat a piece, but his son beat his own father to death in order to attain it himself. The son was killed as well. However, the most profound example of this resided with Elie and his own father. When his father fell gravely ill, Elie detached himself from his father emotionally in order to survive. He stopped answering his father's cries, and he looked on as the officers attack him. He acknowledged his guilt upon wishing his father was gone so that his life would be easier, yet he longed for the extra soup and bread he could have if he stopped giving it to his dying father (111). I was greatly disturbed by this. I cannot imagine being in this situation with my family, and giving up on their survival so that I could live myself. I really don't think I could ever do that to my own mother, father, or siblings. I would want them to live as badly, or more badly, than I wanted to live myself. He also did not cry when his father died, and I can't imagine why. I certainly would have if I had gone through such an ordeal and had lost the only thing that was holding me together, albeit by even a single thread. However, how could I judge Elie? He survived a horrendous ordeal, something I would never wish upon anyone. As much as I try to put myself in his shoes, I know I could never accurately picture it unless I had gone through it myself. As horrific as the story was, I'm glad I had the opportunity to read Night; it truly made me appreciate what I have, and I know that, even when things seem bleakest, they could always be a lot worse.
TThroughout the entire text, it seems as if Elie and his father have been drifting farther apart. The portion of the story in particular where he considers that it would benefit him more if his father was dead is a great example and also makes me sick. People were even persuading him to take his father's rations (111). This almost made me wonder if it was the same individual that we met on page one. I feel as if he was acting selfish, but you are completely correct. We are in no place to criticize him. Your last opinion really sums up my feelings as well. I am so much more thankful for being able to live the life that I have. Unfortunately Elie's father is not able to see what an impact his son's book is making on many people across the nation, such as you and I.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI noticed that you mentioned in your response that you wished that this story was simply riveting fiction and really, if you read it, Wiesel makes it seem so. Vivid imagery, unreal comparisons, a sickening plot... But it never seems to end. The last pages don't close the story, there is no neat ending saying that he lived happily ever after because he didn't yet know. As I read this book, I read it as I do my fiction stories, stopping where it stuns me, never thinking 'this actually happened' but thinking 'what IF this actually happened.' I think I failed to really connect to the fact that this was all fact until I read the last lines of the book, the vague, open ending. What was I thinking throughout the read? This is a horrible way to treat people. What did I think as soon as I was done? This really happened?
ReplyDeleteIt was scary. I didn't realize I myself was disconnecting from the text until i realized there wasn't an end, that in order to find an end I'd have to look through history and history is, inevitably, always true... and always uncut.